Correcting Errors Using the Framework of Argumentation: Towards Generating Argumentative Correction Propositions from Error Annotation Schemas
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper presents a first step towards the automatic generation of argumentative responses to accompany the corrections proposed by a correction and writing-aid system. This system focuses on pairs of languages (e.g. French speakers writing in English), and incorporates a strong didactic orientation. We show how, in case several corrections are available, error annotations can be used to design argumentations weighing the pros and cons of each correction. Argumentation is paired with decision theory in order to help the user pick out the most appropriate correction. Argumentative responses produced manually are used to create the generation schemas required to implement the automatic generation of such texts in the future.
منابع مشابه
Annotating language errors in texts: investigating argumentation and decision schemas
In this short paper, we present annotations for tagging grammatical and stylistic errors, together with attributes about the nature of the correction which are then interpreted as arguments. A decision model is introduced in order for the author to be able to decide on the best correction to make. This introduces an operational semantics for tags and related attributes. 1 Aims and Situation Non...
متن کاملGrammatical Error Correction of English as Foreign Language Learners
This study aimed to discover the insight of error correction by implementing two correction systems on three Iranian university students. The three students were invited to write four in-class essays throughout the semester, in which their verb errors and individual-selected errors were corrected using the Code Correction System and the Individual Correction System. At the end of the study, the...
متن کاملAn approach to fault detection and correction in design of systems using of Turbo codes
We present an approach to design of fault tolerant computing systems. In this paper, a technique is employed that enable the combination of several codes, in order to obtain flexibility in the design of error correcting codes. Code combining techniques are very effective, which one of these codes are turbo codes. The Algorithm-based fault tolerance techniques that to detect errors rely on the c...
متن کاملCorrecting Syntactic Annotation Errors Using a Synchronous Tree Substitution Grammar
This paper proposes a method of correcting annotation errors in a treebank. By using a synchronous grammar, the method transforms parse trees containing annotation errors into the ones whose errors are corrected. The synchronous grammar is automatically induced from the treebank. We report an experimental result of applying our method to the Penn Treebank. The result demonstrates that our metho...
متن کاملProbabilistic abstract argumentation: an investigation with Boltzmann machines
Probabilistic argumentation and neuro-argumentative systems offer new computational perspectives for the theory and applications of argumentation, but their principled construction involve two entangled problems. On the one hand, probabilistic argumentation aims at combining the quantitative uncertainty addressed by probability theory with the qualitative uncertainty of argumentation, but proba...
متن کامل